Welcome
Welcome to designmechanism

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Classic Fantasy Errata

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby threedeesix » Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:49 am

raleel wrote:What is the Hook combat effect listed for the Bill?


You need to update your PDF, that was changed to Sunder months ago. :)

Rod
User avatar
threedeesix
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:40 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby raleel » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:20 pm

huh... i bought it after those updates
User avatar
raleel
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:11 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby threedeesix » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:31 pm

raleel wrote:huh... i bought it after those updates


Just try downloading again it and let me know. My PDF has the changes in it, so if you could try it again that would be awesome.

Rod
User avatar
threedeesix
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:40 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby raleel » Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:01 pm

threedeesix wrote:
raleel wrote:huh... i bought it after those updates


Just try downloading again it and let me know. My PDF has the changes in it, so if you could try it again that would be awesome.

Rod


so I downloaded the interactive one to check, and it's fine. the non-interactive one is the issue and is apparently the original unerrataed one

my previous experience has been that "interactive" was a different thing entirely (Monster Island had this... interactive was all the maps), or was the same content (ala Mythras, where interactive had bookmarks and links and non-interactive did not). I have not run into a "old version/new version" instance :) so, confusion
User avatar
raleel
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:11 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby threedeesix » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:43 pm

As long as your up to date, I'm happy. :-)
User avatar
threedeesix
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:40 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby raleel » Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:32 pm

threedeesix wrote:As long as your up to date, I'm happy. :-)


and that I am.

I would happily add all the bookmarks for the sections and subchapters to your PDF so I don't have to do it every time I download an update :)
User avatar
raleel
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:11 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby raleel » Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:42 am

In the spell list at the end of rank 3, spiritual hammer is listed as the "innovation" school. Considering how we have a gnome cleric in my group, I assume this means he gets this one for free and it's a giant steampunk hammer.
User avatar
raleel
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:11 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby threedeesix » Thu Sep 15, 2016 10:56 am

raleel wrote:In the spell list at the end of rank 3, spiritual hammer is listed as the "innovation" school. Considering how we have a gnome cleric in my group, I assume this means he gets this one for free and it's a giant steampunk hammer.


The Innovation School is a great one for gnomes. Hopefully, there is only the one spell in the school. :D

Rod
User avatar
threedeesix
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:40 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby Mike Schulenberg » Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:12 pm

Bilharzia wrote:About my only gripe with CF layout is that gradient, it doesn't read well on the dark side. I would prefer a single light tone across the whole width.

I realize this is an old discussion and there's probably not much that can be done, but I've been giving my CF copy a close look with thoughts of starting a game, and I find the charts in my printed copy extremely hard to read. It's better in the PDF, but I think I'd prefer a single light shade across the whole width as well.

But the content looks pretty great, and I think it might work really well for a setting I have in mind to create.
User avatar
Mike Schulenberg
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 6:09 pm

Re: Classic Fantasy Errata

Postby raleel » Sun Oct 16, 2016 9:27 pm

Just noticed that the alteration section of specialist magic users mentions enlarge, but it is not listed. Considering how I would expect it to be in the rank 1 range, did it get cut?
User avatar
raleel
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:11 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Supplements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

suspicion-preferred